All-American Packaging, LLC v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. et al 6:17-cv-00214

All-American Packaging, LLC v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. et al 6:17-cv-00214 Filed: 04/11/2017

All-American Packaging, LLC v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. et al

Plaintiff: All-American Packaging, LLC
Defendant: Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. and Westrock Company
Case Number: 6:2017cv00214
Filed: April 11, 2017
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Office: Tyler Office
County: Anderson
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

http://www.mypatentcourse.com/








Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Selected patent law 3-29-2017

Whether a specification complies with the written description requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, is a question of fact. Regents of Univ. of Cal. v. Eli Lilly and Co., 119 F.3d 1559, 1566 (Fed. Cir. 1997) citing Vas-Cath Inc. v. Mahurkar, 935 F.2d 1555, 1563 (Fed. Cir. 1991)). The Examiner has the initial burden of presenting evidence or reasoning to explain why persons skilled in the art would not recognize in the original disclosure a description of the invention defined by the claims. In re Wertheim, 541 F.2d 257, 263 (CCPA 1976). “Although the applicant does not have to describe exactly the subject matter claimed, the description must clearly allow persons of ordinary skill in the art to recognize that he or she invented what is claimed.” Vas-Cath Inc. v. Mahurkar, 935 F.2d 1555, 1563 (Fed. Cir. 1991). Non-obviousness cannot be established by attacking the references individually when the rejection is predicated upon a combination of prior art disclosures. See In r...
Read more

Affirmed Marketing, LLC v. Plumbing Supermarket et al 3:17-cv-00660

Image
Affirmed Marketing vs Plumbing Supermarket 3:17-cv-00660 Filed: 03/31/2017  Affirmed Marketing, LLC v. Plumbing Supermarket et al Plaintiff:   Affirmed Marketing, LLC Defendant:   Plumbing Supermarket, Kooky Kids, Home Sweet Home Direct and Does 1-25 Case Number:   3:2017cv00660 Filed:   March 31, 2017 Court:   California Southern District Court Office:   San Diego Office County:   XX US, Outside State Presiding Judge:   Michael M. Anello Referring Judge:   Karen S. Crawford Nature of Suit:   Patent Cause of Action:   35:0271 Patent Infringement Jury Demanded By:   Plaintiff http://www.mypatentcourse.com/lawsuit-updates/ Abstract An insect capturing device including a head having bristles which are arranged in concentric rings. A handle has a trigger which allows a user to move the bristles between a diverged position and a converged position in which an insect is entrapped without bei...
Read more

Tristar Products Vs Penn 2:17-cv-02067 pan

Image
Tristar Products Vs Penn 2:17-cv-02067 Filed: 03/29/2017  http://www.mypatentcourse.com/lawsuit-updates/ D778664S1 Pan 01/24/2016 D772641S1 Pan 01/24/2016 D777506S1 Round Pan 01/24/2016 D778103S1 Pan 01/24/2016 Plaintiff: TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC. Defendant: PENN LLC and PULSE DIRECT, INC. Case Number: 2:2017cv02067 Filed: March 29, 2017 Court: New Jersey District Court Office: Newark Office County: Atlantic Nature of Suit: Patent Cause of Action: 35:271 Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff Penn LLC Penn LLC Pulse Direct, Inc. 2:17-cv-02067 03/29/2017 Ocean State Jobbers Incorporated Ocean State Jobbers Incorporated 2:17-cv-01767 03/16/2017 Zhejiang Cooker King Cooker Co.,... Zhejiang Cooker King Cooker Co.,... 2:17-cv-01767 03/16/2017 Telebrands Corporation Telebrands Corporation Bulbhead.com, LLC 1:17-cv-01206 02/21/2017 E. Mishan & Sons E Mishan and Sons Incorporated 1:17-cv-01204 02/21/2017 TV Direct LLC TV Direct LLC 1:17-cv-00060 02/1...
Read more