RTC Industries vs FFR Merchandising 1:17-cv-03595 Product management display system US 6964235

RTC Industries, Inc. v. FFR Merchandising, Inc. 1:17-cv-03595 Filed: 05/12/2017

Product management display system US 6,964,235 B2 Filed: 05/17/2002

http://mypatentcourse.thinkific.com/






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Affirmed Marketing, LLC v. Plumbing Supermarket et al 3:17-cv-00660

Image
Affirmed Marketing vs Plumbing Supermarket 3:17-cv-00660 Filed: 03/31/2017  Affirmed Marketing, LLC v. Plumbing Supermarket et al Plaintiff:   Affirmed Marketing, LLC Defendant:   Plumbing Supermarket, Kooky Kids, Home Sweet Home Direct and Does 1-25 Case Number:   3:2017cv00660 Filed:   March 31, 2017 Court:   California Southern District Court Office:   San Diego Office County:   XX US, Outside State Presiding Judge:   Michael M. Anello Referring Judge:   Karen S. Crawford Nature of Suit:   Patent Cause of Action:   35:0271 Patent Infringement Jury Demanded By:   Plaintiff http://www.mypatentcourse.com/lawsuit-updates/ Abstract An insect capturing device including a head having bristles which are arranged in concentric rings. A handle has a trigger which allows a user to move the bristles between a diverged position and a converged position in which an insect is entrapped without being injured. The device may then be carried outdoors and the bris
Read more

35 U.S.C. 112 SPECIFICATION

35 U.S.C. 112  SPECIFICATION http://www.bitlaw.com/source/35usc/112.html (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. (c) FORM.—A claim may be written in independent or, if the nature of the case admits, in dependent or multiple dependent form. (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and the
Read more